Re: [STUMP] [PATCH] command-mode-hook

[Ben Spencer]

On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 08:57:05PM -0800, Matt Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Ben Spencer <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On reflection, maybe we should prepopulate the hooks with message
> > functions after all.  If so, they should be named, exported functions,
> > eg command-mode-start-message and command-mode-end-message.  This
> > would enable the user to selectively remove parts of the default hook.
> >
> > Anyone else have opinions on this approach?
> 
> I took this approach and can change it if something else comes up.

I've changed the way these hooks are defined to use the function
symbols directly rather than via a lambda.  The point here is to allow
the user to do:

(remove-hook *command-mode-start-hook* 'command-mode-start-message)

etc.

Otherwise looks cool, and I've pushed the patch.  Nice work :)


Ben