Re: [STUMP] Please consider removing module.lisp.in.

[Desmond O. Chang]

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 15:54, Ben Spencer <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 04:06:32AM +0800, Desmond O. Chang wrote:
>> Since most of implementations already included asdf2, bundled asdf has
>> been unnecessary, although leaving it is harmless.  I never use it.
>
> clisp does not, unless things have changed.  I believe this was the
> original reason for including it.  That said, the README recommends
> installing asdf first anyway so you can use asdf-install to get
> dependencies.

For the users who want to use asdf in clisp, they can install the
extra module, or enable asdf at compile time, or load asdf.lisp in
their rcfiles.  There should be no differences between stumpwm and
other asdf-based projects.