Re: [STUMP] StumpWM port to LispWorks 6.x

[Shawn Betts]

Hi Kamil,

What I meant was that the actual patches applied to the master branch
didn't include the formatting changes. It's a bit of an anal
bookkeeping request but that's how I am I guess :).

I think all those patches in your branch wrapped into a single
one--minus the unrelated formatting changes--would be okay.

-Shawn

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Kamil Shakirov <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Shawn,
>
>
> On 10/15/2012 11:42 PM, Shawn Betts wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Kamil Shakirov <address@hidden>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have ported the latest StumpWM to LispWorks 6.x (tested with LW Pro
>>> and Personal editions). Is anyone interested in merging it?
>>
>>
>> Hi Kamil,
>>
>> I had a look at the patches and they all seem good except for the
>> initial port df2227d on github. There are formatting changes that are
>> irrelevant to the port. If you can eliminate those, I'll pull it into
>> master.
>
>
> Sorry about that ;-) I just commited a patch 13cd2eb that removes irrelevant
> formatting from make-image.lisp.in file.
>
> Thanks a lot for the StumpWM.
>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -Shawn
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
>>
>
>
> --
> --ska.