[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] Stumpwm-devel Digest, Vol 105, Issue 12
From: |
Evan |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] Stumpwm-devel Digest, Vol 105, Issue 12 |
Date: |
Fri, 31 Jan 2014 13:26:58 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 |
That's really nice! I really like the top one, but it's hard to
differentiate between the W and the M. Would it be possible to make the
two easier to tell apart without actually separating them?
-E
On 01/31/2014 12:22 PM, Kenan Bölükbaşı wrote:
> Hi, I am a designer and a stumpwm fan. I couldn't keep myself from
> drafting an alternative when I saw the logo discussion. So, how about
> one of these:
>
> http://kenanb.com/static/img/stumpwm.png
>
>
> 2014-01-31 <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>:
>
> Send Stumpwm-devel mailing list submissions to
> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Stumpwm-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. New Logo Survey (David Bjergaard)
> 2. Re: New Logo Survey (Alex Kost)
> 3. Re: Revitalizing StumpWM (Michael Filonenko)
> 4. Re: New Logo Survey (David Bjergaard)
> 5. Re: New Logo Survey (Pedro Insua)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:10:03 -0500
> From: David Bjergaard <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> To: stumpwm-devel <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Subject: [STUMP] New Logo Survey
> Message-ID: <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Hi All,
>
> The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using
> stump four
> years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've created a
> google form where you can vote for your favorite:
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform
>
> In a week I'll announce the winner. As said on the form, and on the
> wiki:
>
> For any of the logos [...], minor changes would be needed to really use
> them as a logo.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
> [1] https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:45:57 +0400
> From: Alex Kost <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> To: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [STUMP] New Logo Survey
> Message-ID: <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> David Bjergaard (2014-01-30 22:10 +0400) wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using
> stump four
> > years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've
> created a
> > google form where you can vote for your favorite:
> >
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform
>
> I drew an SVG of my variant of logo. I hope it's not too late to
> participate in the competition :)
>
> The logo can be found in the bottom of
> <https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo> or at
> <https://github.com/alezost/stumpwm-logo>.
>
> --
> All the best, Alex
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:01:05 +0400
> From: Michael Filonenko <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> To: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>,
> StumpWM-devel <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Subject: Re: [STUMP] Revitalizing StumpWM
> Message-ID:
>
> <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi all.
>
> clx-truetype performance leaks are bitmap caching at client side,
> instead
> of server side and kerning.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Michael Raskin
> <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>wrote:
>
> > >Michael Raskin <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> writes:
> > >
> > >>>> 3. Text drawing is slower with this fork, especially when some
> > character
> > >>>> is drawn after it is purged from cache as too old. As far as
> > >>>> I understand this doesn't affect fixed fonts, but it is
> something to
> > >>>> document?
> > >>>Can you explain point 3? I'm happy to merge this with the
> core, I just
> > >>>want to understand exactly what you mean. I'm actually using this
> > >>>version on one of my computers now.
> > >>
> > >> I have a custom command (listing all tags of all windows) that
> produces
> > >> a lot of text. If I run it twice, second run is almost always
> > >> instantaneous. But sometimes the first run of that command
> takes a few
> > >> seconds. Under adverse conditions it can even take ten seconds
> to draw
> > >> the message.
> > >If I'm following, users of bitmap fonts won't see a difference,
> but if
> > >you choose to render truetype (TT) fonts then you may see a delay
> if stump
> > >tries to dump a lot of text on screen?
> >
> > I didn't test it well, but apparently fixed font works fine.
> >
> > >The takeaway is:
> > >1. If this is reintegrated, users will get the same old
> > > performance "out of the box"
> > >2. If you choose to use TT fonts, you may see performance impacts
> when
> > > dumping large chunks of text to the screen
> > >
> > >Michael, are you aware of why this is the case? Is it an issue
> that can
> > >be fixed in StumpWM, or is it in the TT rendering library? It
> would be
> > >helpful to have an example command that just dumped a grid of
> characters
> > >so that we could ensure that there isn't something funky going on
> > >elsewhere.
> >
> > I feel it is a problem with clx-truetype, but I am not completely
> sure.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
> >
>
>
>
> --
> With best regards, Michael Filonenko
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
> <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/stumpwm-devel/attachments/20140131/ca1c919b/attachment.html>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:18:02 -0500
> From: David Bjergaard <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> To: Alex Kost <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Cc: address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [STUMP] New Logo Survey
> Message-ID: <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've added Alex's logo as an option. Since his logo was a late edition
> I've split the responses into a new file.
>
> *Note* If you have already voted, you may vote again for Alex's logo if
> you want to.
>
> In the event of a tie between the new and old responses, we'll have a
> tiebreaker between the two tied logos.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
> Alex Kost <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> writes:
>
> > David Bjergaard (2014-01-30 22:10 +0400) wrote:
> >
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using
> stump four
> >> years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've
> created a
> >> google form where you can vote for your favorite:
> >>
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform
> >
> > I drew an SVG of my variant of logo. I hope it's not too late to
> > participate in the competition :)
> >
> > The logo can be found in the bottom of
> > <https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo> or at
> > <https://github.com/alezost/stumpwm-logo>.
> >
> > --
> > All the best, Alex
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:40:53 +0100
> From: Pedro Insua <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
> To: stumpwm-devel <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Subject: Re: [STUMP] New Logo Survey
> Message-ID: <address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:10:03 -0500,
> David Bjergaard wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using
> stump four
> > years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've
> created a
> > google form where you can vote for your favorite:
> >
>
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform
>
> Could you put 'none' to be a choice? My minimalistic mind doesn't
> like any logo..
>
>
> (sorry.. my english is really bad..)
>
> >
> > In a week I'll announce the winner. As said on the form, and on the
> > wiki:
> >
> > For any of the logos [...], minor changes would be needed to
> really use
> > them as a logo.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> > address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
>
>
> End of Stumpwm-devel Digest, Vol 105, Issue 12
> **********************************************
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
>