Re: [STUMP] Stumpwm-devel Digest, Vol 105, Issue 12

2014-01-31 <address@hidden>:

Send Stumpwm-devel mailing list submissions to
address@hidden

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
address@hidden

You can reach the person managing the list at
address@hidden

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Stumpwm-devel digest..."

Today's Topics:

1. New Logo Survey (David Bjergaard)
2. Re: New Logo Survey (Alex Kost)
3. Re: Revitalizing StumpWM (Michael Filonenko)
4. Re: New Logo Survey (David Bjergaard)
5. Re: New Logo Survey (Pedro Insua)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:10:03 -0500
From: David Bjergaard <address@hidden>
To: stumpwm-devel <address@hidden>
Subject: [STUMP] New Logo Survey
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain

Hi All,

The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using stump four
years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've created a
google form where you can vote for your favorite:
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform

In a week I'll announce the winner. As said on the form, and on the
wiki:

For any of the logos [...], minor changes would be needed to really use
them as a logo.

Cheers,

Dave

[1] https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:45:57 +0400
From: Alex Kost <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [STUMP] New Logo Survey
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain

David Bjergaard (2014-01-30 22:10 +0400) wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using stump four
> years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've created a
> google form where you can vote for your favorite:
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform

I drew an SVG of my variant of logo. I hope it's not too late to
participate in the competition :)

The logo can be found in the bottom of
<https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo> or at
<https://github.com/alezost/stumpwm-logo>.

--
All the best, Alex

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 14:01:05 +0400
From: Michael Filonenko <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden, StumpWM-devel <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [STUMP] Revitalizing StumpWM
Message-ID:
<CACdxn72TcyrK=u7=kfERt+BgpaLZgCVh8Lru=address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi all.

clx-truetype performance leaks are bitmap caching at client side, instead
of server side and kerning.

On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Michael Raskin <address@hidden>wrote:

> >Michael Raskin <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >>>> 3. Text drawing is slower with this fork, especially when some
> character
> >>>> is drawn after it is purged from cache as too old. As far as
> >>>> I understand this doesn't affect fixed fonts, but it is something to
> >>>> document?
> >>>Can you explain point 3? I'm happy to merge this with the core, I just
> >>>want to understand exactly what you mean. I'm actually using this
> >>>version on one of my computers now.
> >>
> >> I have a custom command (listing all tags of all windows) that produces
> >> a lot of text. If I run it twice, second run is almost always
> >> instantaneous. But sometimes the first run of that command takes a few
> >> seconds. Under adverse conditions it can even take ten seconds to draw
> >> the message.
> >If I'm following, users of bitmap fonts won't see a difference, but if
> >you choose to render truetype (TT) fonts then you may see a delay if stump
> >tries to dump a lot of text on screen?
>
> I didn't test it well, but apparently fixed font works fine.
>
> >The takeaway is:
> >1. If this is reintegrated, users will get the same old
> > performance "out of the box"
> >2. If you choose to use TT fonts, you may see performance impacts when
> > dumping large chunks of text to the screen
> >
> >Michael, are you aware of why this is the case? Is it an issue that can
> >be fixed in StumpWM, or is it in the TT rendering library? It would be
> >helpful to have an example command that just dumped a grid of characters
> >so that we could ensure that there isn't something funky going on
> >elsewhere.
>
> I feel it is a problem with clx-truetype, but I am not completely sure.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
>

--
With best regards, Michael Filonenko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/stumpwm-devel/attachments/20140131/ca1c919b/attachment.html>

------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:18:02 -0500
From: David Bjergaard <address@hidden>
To: Alex Kost <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [STUMP] New Logo Survey
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain

Hi all,

I've added Alex's logo as an option. Since his logo was a late edition
I've split the responses into a new file.

*Note* If you have already voted, you may vote again for Alex's logo if
you want to.

In the event of a tie between the new and old responses, we'll have a
tiebreaker between the two tied logos.

Cheers,

Dave

Alex Kost <address@hidden> writes:

> David Bjergaard (2014-01-30 22:10 +0400) wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using stump four
>> years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've created a
>> google form where you can vote for your favorite:
>> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform
>
> I drew an SVG of my variant of logo. I hope it's not too late to
> participate in the competition :)
>
> The logo can be found in the bottom of
> <https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo> or at
> <https://github.com/alezost/stumpwm-logo>.
>
> --
> All the best, Alex
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel

------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 17:40:53 +0100
From: Pedro Insua <address@hidden>
To: stumpwm-devel <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [STUMP] New Logo Survey
Message-ID: <address@hidden>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

At Thu, 30 Jan 2014 13:10:03 -0500,
David Bjergaard wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> The new logo wiki [1] has been in existence since I started using stump four
> years ago. There are lots of good logos on that page, so I've created a
> google form where you can vote for your favorite:
> https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1EH33y-pmRE4Nv2k769GnEwy7jF1FoZwOhHhFdaShtRk/viewform

Could you put 'none' to be a choice? My minimalistic mind doesn't like any logo..

(sorry.. my english is really bad..)

>
> In a week I'll announce the winner. As said on the form, and on the
> wiki:
>
> For any of the logos [...], minor changes would be needed to really use
> them as a logo.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave
>
> [1] https://github.com/sabetts/stumpwm/wiki/NewLogo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Stumpwm-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel
>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Stumpwm-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/stumpwm-devel

End of Stumpwm-devel Digest, Vol 105, Issue 12
**********************************************

From:	Kenan Bölükbaşı
Subject:	Re: [STUMP] Stumpwm-devel Digest, Vol 105, Issue 12
Date:	Fri, 31 Jan 2014 20:22:48 +0200