Re: Slot allocations

[Noah Lavine]

I recently made two reviews which were aimed at this issue. I took two
projects and tried to argue that they should get slots because they
had unique advantages.

I think the way forward is for many more people to make such reviews.
Then we could have a discussion about the relative merits of each
proposal.

Noah

On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Daniel Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
> So currently there are 16 projects for GNU which are rated with the top
> average score of 5. We have 10 slots. How is that disparity being
> resolved? Are the org admins going to go through those 16 and decide
> which 10 are the best? Is an average score of 5 indicative of that
> project being awesome? Is there anything I should be doing to help?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Daniel
>