[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Taler] BBS+ blind signatures relevant?
From: |
Schanzenbach, Martin |
Subject: |
[Taler] BBS+ blind signatures relevant? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Sep 2021 10:27:23 +0000 |
Hi,
in our DISSENS project [1] we investigated BBS+ signatures on BLS12-381 as a
state of the art method for privacy credentials (specifically selective
disclosure).
We therefore built a C/C++ implementation for such a scheme.
For some time now there has been an effort to standardise the signatures [2]
and maybe this is relevant to Taler as well?
I know that you are looking into blind Schnorr signatures, which are likely to
be more efficient than BBS+ as those are pairing-based.
I also do not know if BBS+ signatures can actually be used in the way Taler
needs blind signatures.
Anyway, may be worth checking out; I am following the standardisation efforts
in case we want to follow the standards for our library and, eventually,
reclaimID.
BR
Martin
[1] https://gnunet.org/en/news/2021-05-DISSENS.html
[2] https://identity.foundation/bbs-signature
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
- [Taler] BBS+ blind signatures relevant?,
Schanzenbach, Martin <=