[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?
From: |
lepton |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug? |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:01:01 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2005 at 05:44:55PM -0600, Greg Haerr wrote:
> : For one thing, sizeof(void*) is much larger
> : than sizeof(int) on the most common 64-bit architectures.
>
> Interesting discussion. What's sizeof(void*) on these
> common 64-bit architectures?
>
> Out of curiousity, what is
>
> sizeof(unsigned short)
2
> sizeof(unsigned long)
8
> sizeof(unsigned long long)
don't know, perhaps 8
>
> on these architectures?
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Alexander Strasser, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Alexander Strasser, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Alexander Strasser, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Dave Dodge, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Felix Nawothnig, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Alexander Strasser, 2005/07/18
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Dave Dodge, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?, Dave Dodge, 2005/07/12
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] casting bug?,
lepton <=