[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] tcc (arm) vs gcc
From: |
Rob Landley |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] tcc (arm) vs gcc |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Sep 2006 21:17:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Wednesday 06 September 2006 6:06 pm, Sven Oliver Moll wrote:
> The ones from libtcc1.c are inline assembler defines, which need to be
> ported from i386 to arm. I guess these might be "borrowed" from glibc.
I wouldn't look at glibc, I'd look at uClibc. They support arm, have an
active development list, and are interested in small and light software:
address@hidden
Or the buildroot mailing list (address@hidden) which is a related
project that creates a whole system out of uClibc and BusyBox. (Generally
not yet self-hosting, though.) They support a half-dozen processors and deal
with lots of cross-platform issues.
Rob
--
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.