[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Tinycc-devel] performances test
From: |
bertie |
Subject: |
[Tinycc-devel] performances test |
Date: |
Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:51:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.2 |
Hi,
Here's a benchmarking of several compiled/pre-compiled/interpreted languages,
on a "hello world" program.
NASM FASM GCC Tcc Pascal Fortran DASH Tcc (interpreted)
Lua (interpreted) Gambas KSH Perl C++ Lua (précompiled)
Ada ZSH TCSH Tcl BASH PHP Python Lush Java
Tcc is doin' good. Add to this it compiles faster than GCC and offers a very
small size compiler... Very impressive. Not to mention it can interpret C, a
very good feature that is included within the tests too!
I can't believe java is 26 times slower. In other words when a java
application is launched, in the meantime you could start 26 applications
written in C. Sad fact, the Java virtual machine shows the same gap on
windowze.
The results are here:
http://perso.orange.fr/2007/Code/hworld/index.htm
Regards,
Bert
- [Tinycc-devel] performances test,
bertie <=