Re: [Tinycc-devel] Buiding binutils 2.17 (needs dynamic arrays).

[Rob Landley]

On Thursday 04 October 2007 1:05:25 am Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 10:49:44PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> > The draft standard I have is 1.5 megabytes of ascii text (ok, html) that
> > reads like it was written by lawyers.  I use it to break ties, not as an
> > implementation guide.
>
> Written by language lawyers, sure.  And tiebreaking is what I meant. :)
>
> > The reason nobody's apparently noticed that tcc doesn't complain about a
> > function returning a function before is because when you feed it legal
> > code it works.  Making it complain properly when fed illegal code is a
> > luxury, which I'll implement if it doesn't bloat it too much.
>
> There's nothing wrong with that attitude.  Still, I haven't looked at
> your branch lately, but I hope it's not claiming C99 compliance or even
> the intent to become C99 compliant in that case :)

I dunno, is gcc claiming c99 compliance?

Rob
-- 
"One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code."
  - Ken Thompson.