Re: [Tinycc-devel] Strange sizeof construct

[Mike]

"(arr)[0]" would be valid yes.  But "40[0]" should be invalid, right?

Chris Lattner wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2007, at 5:18 PM, Mike wrote:
>
> > >>> printf("%d\n",sizeof(arr)[0]); // ok, but why?
> > Why should that be valid syntax?  Is C99 really weird or what?
> > (its a immediate value being used in place of a pointer.)
>
> The C99 grammar says that sizeof is:
>
> unary-expression:
>   sizeof unary-expression
>
> Why do you think it is invalid?  You don't think that "(arr)[0]" is a 
> valid expression?
>
> -Chris
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Tinycc-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel