I would think that it is unlikely that two different anti-malware makers
would detect a virus (on two separate machines) if there were not one.
I would think that they would not use the same detection strings.
Sounds a lot less like a false positive to me at this point.
If you don't know how to fix it, perhaps you can get some help from an
anti-virus maker.
Perhaps it just needs to be recompiled in a C compiler other than itself
to break the cycle of passing on the virus?
I like TCC but I am surely not interested in creating infected apps.
It's embarrassing.
-----Original Message-----
From: grischka <address@hidden>
To: address@hidden
Sent: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 5:41 pm
Subject: Re: Fwd: TCC generating false positive?
address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden> wrote:
> grischka,
> > Can you help me out? (See below).
> ....
>> When I tried the .dll example in the TCC readme, my "Spyware Doctor"
>> detected "E-mail-Worm.Zhelatin!sd5" on the generated executable as soon
>> as it was created. This did NOT happen though if I just did a plain
>> "tcc hello.c" ... only if I did the .dll example. I tried changing the
>> example but the result was the same no matter what I tried.
>> >> Of course, it is likely that this is a false positive, but I thought
>> that I would report this to you anyway so you can check it out.
>> >> Should you wish to contact PC Tools about this, here is where you
can
>> report the problem:
>> >> http://www.pctools.com/mrc/dispute/
Sorry, I don't have that problem. So there is no way for me
to figure out what could be the reason.
Regards.