On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 4:38 AM, Sergei Trofimovich
<address@hidden> wrote:
Hi! tcc is really fast compiler!
I tried to play with it and have managed to build master branch of http://midnight-commander.org/
by tcc on amd64. I grabbed tcc from git://repo.or.cz/tinycc.git
1.
mc compiled and even runs but fails on certain user's operations. I suspect it's a tcc's miscompilation.
In order to debug it i tried valgrind, but even hello_world tcc's produced binaries are
unvalgrindable on my gcc/glibc:
$ cat > hello.c<<EOF
....> int main() { printf("hello!\n"); return 0; }
....> EOF
$ tcc ./hello.c -o hi
$ valgrind ./hi
--12247-- WARNING: Serious error when reading debug info
--12247-- When reading debug info from /tmp/hi:
--12247-- Last block truncated in .debug_info; ignoring
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1243: dl_main: Assertion `_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_libname' failed!
Glibc screwed. Where is an error? glibc being too restrictive? tcc generating bad elf64? valgrind misloading
nonstandard elf?
2.
During compilation I've noticed some evil warnings:
tccgen.c:4091: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
tccgen.c:4114: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size
They frightened me as 'long' is 64bit on gcc and 'int' is 32bit.
Are those generated jumps incorrect or tcc emits 32bit wide addresses?
3.
./include/stddef.h:typedef __SIZE_TYPE__ size_t;
./libtcc.c: tcc_define_symbol(s, "__SIZE_TYPE__", "unsigned int");
./libtcc.c: tcc_define_symbol(s, "__PTRDIFF_TYPE__", "int");
Is it ok? I expected 'unsigned long' and 'long' here on X86_64.
4.
$ cat f.c
int f() { return 3; }
$ tcc -c f.c -o f.o
$ objdump -d f.o
f.o: file format elf64-x86-64
Disassembly of section .text:
0000000000000000 <f>:
0: 55 push %rbp
1: 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
4: 48 81 ec 00 00 00 00 sub $0x0,%rsp
b: b8 03 00 00 00 mov $0x3,%eax
10: e9 00 00 00 00 jmpq 15 <f+0x15>
15: c9 leaveq
16: c3 retq
I understand, tcc isn't intended to generate efficient code, but:
* -fomit-frame-pointer would be cool to have (it should be easy to implement)
* 'sub $0x0,%rsp' could be eliminated as a trivial common case
* 'jmpq 15' could be eliminated as a trivial common case
Thanks!
--
Sergei
_______________________________________________
Tinycc-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/tinycc-devel