Re: [Tinycc-devel] Bashisms in configure and gcctestsuite

[grischka]

Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> > What was the problem with using just conftest.x as suggested?
> Compared to the $RANDOM approach this solution is far less random. 

And what is the problem with less random?

Otherwise I'd suggest to waste time with more useful things, such as
a rewrite of tccgen.c or of the macro preprocessor or an interface
with other code generators such as TCG or LLVM ;)

--- grischka