[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm: Handle __builtin_frame_address(1) correc
From: |
Kirill Smelkov |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm: Handle __builtin_frame_address(1) correctly |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Dec 2012 22:20:12 +0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 02:23:25PM +0100, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
> Le jeudi 6 décembre 2012 04:50:55, vous avez écrit :
> > >
> > > Hi Kirill,
> > >
> > > did you make any progress on the issue since Daniel's comments? Could you
> > > let me know when you push a patch so that I can test it and bump master
> > > to equal the mob branch?
> >
> > Hi Thomas,
> >
> > Unfortunately not that much. I was trying to investigate
> > bounds-checking failures for `tcc -b -run tcc ...` tests first and it looks
> > I'm close to understand what is going on (old bcheck code is not adapted
> > to /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space = 2). The plan was to go to arm
> > issues then, but I'm going very slow, because for tcc I have only 15-20
> > minutes per day and it is all in underground. Sorry. Could this issue
> > please wait me for some time? (probably week or so...)
>
> That's a worthwhile bug to fix
Also grischka writes:
> btest is not a feature that we can't recommend to use
> really (at least as long as tcc -btest tcc.c doesn't produce anything
> useful),
FYI, as of mob a55ecf6d it now does, so please don't treat -b mode as
second class citizen anymore.
Thanks,
Kirill
P.S. sorry for another empty mail - replying through gmane did not work
for me...
Re: [Tinycc-devel] [PATCH] arm: Handle __builtin_frame_address(1) correctly, grischka, 2012/12/06