[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution)
From: |
Sergey Korshunoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution) |
Date: |
Sat, 30 Apr 2016 18:06:23 +0300 |
> PS: what about output with -E should include spaces: #define n 0xe
> {newline} n+1
> You mean the attempts on your branch? Horrible, of course ;)
I mean attached patch. It is not abount X(X(1)), but about
preprocessor output for
#define n 0xe
n+1
It must look like
0xe +1
and not
0xe+1
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), grischka, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), Sergey Korshunoff, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), Edmund Grimley Evans, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), u-tcc-uepj, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), David Mertens, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), Sergey Korshunoff, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), Sergey Korshunoff, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), grischka, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), Sergey Korshunoff, 2016/04/29
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), grischka, 2016/04/30
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution),
Sergey Korshunoff <=
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), grischka, 2016/04/30
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] X(X(1)) (nested macro substitution), Sergey Korshunoff, 2016/04/30