Re: [Tinycc-devel] Hello! Does anyone maintain this still?

[David Smith]

Thanks Jan.

I’m on a mission this quarter to add a new old arch. Lots to learn.

David.


Sent from my iPhone

> On 22 Feb 2020, at 10:24, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> David Smith via Tinycc-devel writes:
> 
> Hello,
> 
>> I noticed a mes/gnu 0.21 branch. How is that related to mob?
>> 
>> https://gitlab.com/janneke/tinycc/-/commits/mes-0.21/
> 
> This is the bootstrappable fork of tinycc.  It's basically a forked off
> a somewhat arbitrary tinycc git development commit some three years ago
> (307b7b183d4ee56e74090b0e525d6a587840e31f) and adds about 12
> patches
> 
>    cee58e0 build: Support building from bootstrap-mes.
>    39de356 bootstrappable: Force static link.
>    2b6271d bootstrappable: Work around MesCC bug.
>    379c62d bootstrappable: add tcc.h include guards to include location.
>    274bd06 bootstrappable: Handle libtcc1.a.
>    6ae9aa4 bootstrappable: Skip tidy_section_headers.
>    a130ce1 bootstrappable: HAVE_FLOAT.
>    de906df bootstrappable: HAVE_BITFIELD.
>    540ba0b bootstrappable: HAVE_LONG_LONG.
>    306f677 bootstrappable: Work around Nyacc-0.80.42 bug.
>    9c97705 build: bootstrap build scripts.
>    584478f bootstrappable: Remove non-free grep test.
> 
> of which only three are really interesting: the HAVE_* patches that
> allow for stepwise introduction of bitfields, doubles/floats and long
> longs.
> 
> I'm hoping to get rid of the need for this fork some time.
> 
> Greetings,
> janneke
> 
> -- 
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
> Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com