|
From: | Clive Tovero |
Subject: | Re: [Tinycc-devel] Problem after compiling tiny CC |
Date: | Mon, 28 Jun 2021 16:22:32 -0400 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 |
Whether opt-in or opt-out, it would be nice to have this in tcc. I guess the downside is more complexity in tcc.
I built Femtolisp as a non-trivial mixed test (gcc/tcc): https://github.com/JeffBezanson/femtolispI specified tcc as the compiler for its separate static, low-leve library in "../llt/Makefile" and kept gcc in "./Makefile" for the rest. I was able to compile and successfully run the test suite with this mixed situation, using "ar -M" and a small MRI script to archive the low-level library with tcc. Libtool might have been another (better?) option to generate the static library.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |