[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY
From: |
Ervin Hegedüs |
Subject: |
Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 15:38:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
hi all,
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 08:14:19AM -0600, Doug Smith W9WI wrote:
> - http://www.frontiernet.net/~aflowers/k3rtty/k3rtty.html suggests
> it is very possible to have an AFSK-generated RTTY signal that's
> *cleaner* than a FSK signal. You do of course have to pay attention
> & make sure you have a clean connection to your radio -- and have
> any OS-generated sounds turned off!
thanks for the link, that's more interesting! :)
(Thomas: sorry for the off-topic thread!)
> - Several users of N1MM Logger have requested a macro to send back
> the received exchange. The developers refuse to do so, stating that
> it's not good practice. To be honest I agree -- it slows down the
> exchange and, if the numbers are similar, can result in confusion.
>
> It's probably not a bad idea to have this function available but I
> would be careful about using it.
yes, that's the point: if anybody doesn't/can't use that, just
simply ignore that macro - that doesn't _need_ to use, that's
only an option.
73,
Ervin
HA2OS
- [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY, Ervin Hegedüs, 2014/02/10
- Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY, Ed, 2014/02/10
- Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY, Bob Nielsen, 2014/02/10
- Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY, Ervin Hegedüs, 2014/02/11
- Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY, Martin Kratoska, 2014/02/11
- Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY, Ervin Hegedüs, 2014/02/11
- Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY, Martin Kratoska, 2014/02/11
- Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY, Ed, 2014/02/11
- Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY, Doug Smith W9WI, 2014/02/11
- Re: [Tlf-devel] Few modification for RTTY,
Ervin Hegedüs <=