Re: [VM] Any interest in trying to make local vs. IMAP folder treatment more seamless

[Uday Reddy]

blueman writes:

> Unfortunately, vm itself is not just binding heavy but actually binding
> dependent in that some key functions *only* seem to work when called
> from a key binding rather than from M-x. I think this is true btw for
> certain mark-related functions with next command uses marks. So that
> while aliases would shorten typing they still don't solve that problem.

That is true, but note that `vm-visit-imap-folder' is something you would
never invoke with marked messages.

My solution has been to free up as many key bindings as possible so that the
users can bind them to whatever is most important to them.  We also have
thread operations now, which can be invoked without messing with message
marking.

Cheers,
Uday