Re: [Vrs-development] Cluster Management Message (was CVS)

[Bill Lance]

--- Chris Smith <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> The layering between Goldwater Domain support and
> LDS->LDS support may blur 
> too much for this to work.  If the abstraction is
> clean and eligent, then we 
> might as well use what Goldwater offers (even if I'm
> practically writing it 
> from scratch again....)
> 

Forgive me for being so dense, but I'm sill confused. 
Are you using 'domain' in the sense of discovering an
IP address, or as a synonym of an IP namespace?


 
> Yep cluster traffic.
> If we're not sending 'cluster' traffic over HTTP,
> then we need some sort of 
> network server.  Phoenix is a very stable,
> efficient, bolt on functionality 
> server that already integrates into Goldwater apps
> (even though I've spent 
> the last few weeks trying to seperate them!)
> 
> Basically you write a module containing a
> read_handler and event_handler that 
> performs the network server functionality you
> require, assign a port number 
> to it and get phoenix to load it on start up.

the inet function ...

  There
> are some rules to comply 
> with when writing such a module as Phoenix is an
> internally multiplexed, 
> thread free, fork'less server.

Is this by intent?  What do you see as the pros and
cons of this?



 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com