[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[XWEM]: xwem-frames are broken (was: Bug in strokes)
From: |
Steve Youngs |
Subject: |
[XWEM]: xwem-frames are broken (was: Bug in strokes) |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Nov 2004 17:32:20 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.4 (Security Through Obscurity, linux) |
* Steve Youngs <address@hidden> writes:
> 2nd problem (consider this one a PEBKAC for now as I haven't
> looked into it yet)
Upgrade it to "real problem"
> I have an extra frame and all my normal frames have moved up one
> in the list. In other words, I now have a new empty frame at
> frame 0, my old frame 0 is now frame 1, old frame 1 is now frame
> 2, etc.
I have no idea WTF you've done here but it is definitely broken! I
think the problem is that there is no longer any way to _NOT_ create
the initial frame. So instead of just getting my "dumped-config"
frames, I am getting the "dumped config" frames _plus_ an initial
frame.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| Te audire no possum. |
| Musa sapientum fixa est in aure. |
|----------------------------------<address@hidden>---|
pgpwyDr_uuvDl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [XWEM]: Bug in strokes, Steve Youngs, 2004/11/28
- Re: [XWEM]: Bug in strokes, Zajcev Evgeny, 2004/11/28
- [XWEM]: Re: Bug in strokes, Steve Youngs, 2004/11/28
- Re: [XWEM]: Re: Bug in strokes, Zajcev Evgeny, 2004/11/28
- Re: [XWEM]: Re: Bug in strokes, Zajcev Evgeny, 2004/11/28
- [XWEM]: Re: Bug in strokes, Steve Youngs, 2004/11/29
- [XWEM]: xwem-frames are broken (was: Bug in strokes),
Steve Youngs <=
- [XWEM]: Re: xwem-frames are broken, Steve Youngs, 2004/11/29
- Re: [XWEM]: Re: xwem-frames are broken, Zajcev Evgeny, 2004/11/29
- [XWEM]: Re: xwem-frames are broken, Steve Youngs, 2004/11/29
- Re: [XWEM]: Re: Bug in strokes, Alexey Mikhailov, 2004/11/29
- Re: [XWEM]: Re: Bug in strokes, Zajcev Evgeny, 2004/11/29
- Re: [XWEM]: Re: Bug in strokes, Andrey Slusar, 2004/11/29