[Help-smalltalk] Terminating the root CallinProcess (was Re: #value sent by cCall?)

[Tony Garnock-Jones]

Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> No, terminate is not abrupt at all.  It works by raising a signal that
> does its way up to this signal handler:

Is it permitted to terminate the "root" CallinProcess?

It seems that it is already dead! which could be the cause of the fault
I was seeing? I also have a test case that does Something Weird, but I'm
not sure whether it's a problem with my code or with the system. I'll
attach it in a separate message.

~$ gst
GNU Smalltalk ready

st> Processor activeProcess.
CallinProcess('call-in process' at userSchedulingPriority, terminated)
st> Processor activeProcess terminate.
CallinProcess('call-in process' at userSchedulingPriority, terminated)
st> Processor activeProcess terminate.
CallinProcess('call-in process' at userSchedulingPriority, terminated)
st>


Tony
-- 
 [][][] Tony Garnock-Jones     | Mob: +44 (0)7905 974 211
   [][] LShift Ltd             | Tel: +44 (0)20 7729 7060
 []  [] http://www.lshift.net/ | Email: address@hidden