help-smalltalk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Help-smalltalk] Sending 'Recompiling' messages to stderr instead of


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Help-smalltalk] Sending 'Recompiling' messages to stderr instead of stdout?
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:51:19 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121016 Thunderbird/16.0.1

Il 30/10/2012 18:39, Rick Flower ha scritto:
> So, I've got a few scripts that use the XML package.. When I bring that
> package in I get the messages below emitted to stdout along with the output
> of my script.
> 
> In light of the fact that this script will be used in an environment
> where someone using the script won't know what these messages mean,
> I was thinking it'd be nice to send those to stderr instead of stdout.
> That way I can, as the script writer, choose whether or not stderr
> output is seen or not.. Are there any pitfalls to doing something like
> this?

Makes sense!  Would you like to try writing a patch?

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]