[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ?
From: |
Nelson Henry Eric |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ? |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Feb 1997 09:37:02 +0900 (JST) |
> Jim Spath & I are working on a configure script that will (presumably) be
> incorporated into 2.8 (3.0?) - I'm near to having a first version that can be
> tested by other developers. Who should I be talking to (e.g., FM or RP)?
1) Could we give it a try with 2.7? Just post the script, uuencoded or not,
or put it up (or have someone with space put it up) on the web. A brief
`walk-me-through' on how to use it and get the necessary tools would be good
(Jim ?).
2) Were you able to handle the `#RESOLVLIB= -lresolv' problem on suns? In
the past, novices have been pretty much told to use it or not on a trial and
error basis. However, the past few days I've been trying to install a new
BIND, and it has become fairly obvious where the need for this define comes
from (failure to incorporate it into libc).
Good work guys!
__Henry
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ?, T.E.Dickey, 1997/02/17
- Re: LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ?,
Nelson Henry Eric <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ?, T.E.Dickey, 1997/02/18
- Re: LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ?, Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1997/02/18
- Re: LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ?, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1997/02/18
- Re: LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ?, Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1997/02/18
- Re: LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ?, Marc Baudoin, 1997/02/18
- Re: LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ?, Jim Spath (Webmaster Jim), 1997/02/18
- Re: LYNX-DEV post-2.7 ?, Marc Baudoin, 1997/02/18