[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV: require actual YES for "Q" cmd.
From: |
Matt Ackeret |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV: require actual YES for "Q" cmd. |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Jan 1998 11:49:20 -0800 (PST) |
On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, David Combs wrote:
>The Q cmd should require a full "y e s" spelled
>out.
...
>Too darned easy to type in the wrong thing.
...
>Instead of typing H to go back, you hit qdp --
>oops, you are OUT, lynx is gone.
No way. You're missing the simple (and human-interfacely correct) solution.
It should default to NO. You always default to the safe thing.
You should have to explicitly type a y or Y (or a whole string beginning with
a y or Y, if you want to keep the same kind of command interface).
Requiring *me* to type _more_ because you mistype is not a good thing.
(I usually use Q anyway to avoid the damn "modal dialog", since that's
effectively what it is.)
- LYNX-DEV: require actual YES for "Q" cmd., David Combs, 1998/01/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV: require actual YES for "Q" cmd., Jan Hlavacek, 1998/01/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV: require actual YES for "Q" cmd., Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1998/01/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV: require actual YES for "Q" cmd.,
Matt Ackeret <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV: require actual YES for "Q" cmd., Michael Warner, 1998/01/28
- Re: LYNX-DEV: require actual YES for "Q" cmd., Philip Webb, 1998/01/29