[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: secondary expansion changes
From: |
Paul Smith |
Subject: |
Re: secondary expansion changes |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:18:23 -0400 |
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 11:53 +0200, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> Boris Kolpackov <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > http://www.codesynthesis.com/~boris/tmp/make-valgrind.log
>
> Here is another one, for today's cvs:
>
> http://www.codesynthesis.com/~boris/tmp/make-valgrind-1.log
Ah, this looks much better. You don't need to use the
--still-reachable=yes flag; make makes no attempt to clean up all memory
that it has allocated before it exits. This is a performance feature,
not a bug :-).
I ran a build of glibc and the memory profile looks better there too.
I'm still interested in any other information you have on where the huge
amount of allocated/then freed memory is in your environment. Also, if
you have comparisons to older versions of make and their memory profile
(if your environment can build with them).
Thanks!
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Smith <address@hidden> Find some GNU make tips at:
http://www.gnu.org http://make.mad-scientist.net
"Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
- Re: secondary expansion changes, (continued)
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/24
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Paul Smith, 2009/09/24
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/24
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Paul Smith, 2009/09/24
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/25
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Paul Smith, 2009/09/25
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/25
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Paul Smith, 2009/09/25
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/25
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/28
- Re: secondary expansion changes,
Paul Smith <=
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/29
- Re: secondary expansion changes, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/30
- Re: shortest stem, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/24
- Re: shortest stem, Paul Smith, 2009/09/24
- Re: shortest stem, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/24
- Re: shortest stem, Paul Smith, 2009/09/25
- Re: shortest stem, Boris Kolpackov, 2009/09/28
- Re: shortest stem, Paul Smith, 2009/09/28