|
From: | graydon hoare |
Subject: | [Monotone-devel] Re: Scenario for tracking upstream package |
Date: | Mon, 08 Mar 2004 10:50:26 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4 |
address@hidden wrote:
Is this reasonable? It would be nice to have a cookbook of some common scenarios like this.
yes, that sounds reasonable (the multiple copies of files will not take any extra space in your db, since they are identical content-wise). you're right that you will -- until the upstream uses a sufficiently fancy VC system which tracks such things -- need to infer deletes and renames yourself.
as you say, we ought to have more in the docs about using multiple branches, and doing distributed "staging areas", advanced uses of the tool. I hadn't thought of a good way to phrase such except as "extended tutorial", but I like your idea of calling this a "cookbook" quite a bit. there are several important "recipes" people might like to see. I'll add a "cookbook" chapter to the next release of the manual. thanks!
-graydon
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |