monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Monotone-devel] Re: Scenario for tracking upstream package


From: graydon hoare
Subject: [Monotone-devel] Re: Scenario for tracking upstream package
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 10:50:26 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20031205 Thunderbird/0.4

address@hidden wrote:

Is this reasonable?  It would be nice to have a cookbook of some
common scenarios like this.

yes, that sounds reasonable (the multiple copies of files will not take any extra space in your db, since they are identical content-wise). you're right that you will -- until the upstream uses a sufficiently fancy VC system which tracks such things -- need to infer deletes and renames yourself.

as you say, we ought to have more in the docs about using multiple branches, and doing distributed "staging areas", advanced uses of the tool. I hadn't thought of a good way to phrase such except as "extended tutorial", but I like your idea of calling this a "cookbook" quite a bit. there are several important "recipes" people might like to see. I'll add a "cookbook" chapter to the next release of the manual. thanks!

-graydon




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]