monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] Debian package enhancements


From: Matthew A. Nicholson
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] Debian package enhancements
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 05:25:11 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404)

Matthew A. Nicholson wrote:
Tomas Fasth wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matthew A. Nicholson skrev:

Tomas Fasth wrote:


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matthew, all,

I have a few comments to your suggested patch.

The debian files have changed in repository since the release of
monotone 0.19. You may want to update your patch to reflect those
changes.


How can we get together on this debian package?



Ah, yes. I'm sorry for lack of response, but I have been busy
elsewere. I suggest we leave the current binary package alone and
instead create a complementary second binary package, named
"monotone-server" or similar, containing the scripts and
configuration needed to run monotone as a network service in the
background. I would like to use runit to supervise it, and the
monotone-server package will therefore depend on the runit package.

Does it sound sane? If it does, we can move forward right away.


Hmmm... monotone-server package... Depends on the client, and install the stuff for the server. That sounds ok, although it could just as well go in the same package. But I guess that could work.

In what state is your patch currently? How much of it do you think
is compatible or useful in a runit scenario?


I don't know anything about runit so I can't comment on that. As for the status of my patch, basically it is an init script, and an /etc/default/monotone file. We need to add default hooks.lua file, and some postinstall magic to create a database.

I just checked out runit and it looks very intresting, although I am not sure how well we could integrate it into a debian install, without a lot of hassel. Keep in mind that I breifly looked over it.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]