[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: The new macro M is no good...
From: |
Nathaniel Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: The new macro M is no good... |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 18:18:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 11:33:49AM -0700, Steven E. Harris wrote:
> Funny, just last night I read Item 0 in /C++ Coding Standards/ by
> Sutter and Alexandrescu?:
>
> [A]lways use ONLY_UPPERCASE_NAMES for macros and never think about
> writing a macro that is a common word or abbreviation (including
> common template parameters, such as T and U; writing #define T
> /anything/ is extremely disruptive).
Well, yes, it's good advice. But since M _cannot_ be a non-macro, and
to be useful needs be quick and easy to type (or it will not be
used), the question we're left with is which rules to break how...
-- Nathaniel
--
Eternity is very long, especially towards the end.
-- Woody Allen
- [Monotone-devel] The new macro M is no good..., Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/07/24
- Re: [Monotone-devel] The new macro M is no good..., Nathaniel Smith, 2005/07/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] The new macro M is no good..., Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2005/07/25
- [Monotone-devel] Re: The new macro M is no good..., Steven E. Harris, 2005/07/25
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: The new macro M is no good...,
Nathaniel Smith <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: The new macro M is no good..., Florian Weimer, 2005/07/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: The new macro M is no good..., Nathaniel Smith, 2005/07/26
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: The new macro M is no good..., Brian Downing, 2005/07/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: The new macro M is no good..., Nathaniel Smith, 2005/07/27
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: The new macro M is no good..., Matthew Gregan, 2005/07/27