Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: The new macro M is no good...

[Matthew Gregan]

At 2005-07-27T14:57:48-0700, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
> Of course, we don't compile on VC++ at all ATM, so I'm not sure how
> problematic this is :-).

And if or when we do, it's likely to be VC++ 7.1 upwards--the surgery
required to work with VC++ 6.0 would probably be quite ugly.  VC++ 6.0
is officially unsupported by Microsoft (or is soon to be), and has
roughly the same level of C++ standards compliance as a Perl
interpreter. ;-)

Cheers,
-mjg
-- 
Matthew Gregan                     |/
                                  /|                address@hidden