[Monotone-devel] Re: monotone-viz can't parse?

[Bruce Stephens]

Bruce Stephens <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

> I think that would be a bug, but I don't think it's true, is it?  For
> example, ff8534867e5887ee95b64b7d3e931fc6fdf5dbd2 is a merge of
> 06c7bee4908ccedcc08af304925b75aefcd93e3e and
> 41eef7bebdea151436fc9f0331f6297e64e8a491, and has two old_revision
> lines.

That's not idea, I guess, since it's an explicit_merge.  (I just took
the last three column line from "automate graph".)
3f031d09bb22a48e99eec18668fec0cf39ae6a88 is a regular merge, and looks
OK to me (it has two old_revision lines).

Ah:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key   : address@hidden
Sig   : ok
Name  : changelog
Value : merge of 5aeec4195cfe43987e529f8aef6757ea088a43cb
      :      and 80e5b78c2780d96d629c26ecb8acc3c67ce30e00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

old_revision [6bed111c6f7cdfee0db471a5a22d359030207059]
old_revision [deefe7ab8392786a5817413c77dfd79f4f8cd971]

I guess db rosterify doesn't rewrite the ids in changelogs?

(I'm not sure that it should, I'm just commenting.)