[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance
From: |
Daniel Carosone |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Aug 2006 10:41:46 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 |
On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:38:58PM -0700, Eric Anderson wrote:
> My guess is that it will be
> very rare that the memory bounding code is used, but if someone is
> committing a huge tree (for example an import), I don't think you want
> monotone to try to keep the entire compressed import in memory.
Does it matter if the memory bounds are hit for just a single large
file, rather than a large tree of small files?
--
Dan.
pgpWqbZxGZ2yj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/07
optimized SHA1 (was Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/05