[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance
From: |
Eric Anderson |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Aug 2006 20:42:24 -0700 |
Daniel Carosone writes:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2006 at 05:38:58PM -0700, Eric Anderson wrote:
> > My guess is that it will be
> > very rare that the memory bounding code is used, but if someone is
> > committing a huge tree (for example an import), I don't think you want
> > monotone to try to keep the entire compressed import in memory.
>
> Does it matter if the memory bounds are hit for just a single large
> file, rather than a large tree of small files?
I can't see why it would matter. If you committed a single large file
(>16MB compressed), it would get sent to sqllite immediately rather
than waiting for additional files. If you commited 15MB compressed
and then 16MB compressed, all 31MB would be sent at once to sqllite.
-Eric
- [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/01
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/02
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/05
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/06
- Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance, Eric Anderson, 2006/08/07
optimized SHA1 (was Re: [Monotone-devel] net.venge.monotone.experiment.performance), Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/05