[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Monotone-devel] Feature Request: enhanced .mtn-ignore
From: |
Johan Bolmsjö |
Subject: |
Re: [Monotone-devel] Feature Request: enhanced .mtn-ignore |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Aug 2006 18:23:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Friday 04 August 2006 20:01, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote:
> Monotone seems to have borrowed the .cvsignore idea directly
> for .mtn-ignore. When we did this for OpenCM, we introduced a small,
> backwards-compatible change that users really seem to like. I'ld like to
> propose that Monotone adopt what we did. It's useful, backwards
> compatible, simple to do, and I'ld be willing to supply the patch if
> people agree.
>
> The difference is that in OpenCM, we can explicitly *include* files.
> Rules are processed top to bottom. Here is a comparative example:
>
> .mtn-ignore .opencm-rules
> ==================== =====================
> *~ exclude *~
> *.o exclude *.o
> include anexception.o
>
> We don't use the include feature very often, but when we do it is very
> useful. The include feature lets us do two things:
>
Disclaimer: monotone user...
For me this would be useful too. I have one project (branch) where I wish to
store *.a files. My solution so far has been to have a monotonerc file in the
_MTN directory of this branch with a modified ignore hook. The drawback of
this solution is of course that files under _MTN can not be version
controlled so this change is local to the workdir.
/Johan
- [Monotone-devel] Feature Request: enhanced .mtn-ignore, Jonathan S. Shapiro, 2006/08/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Feature Request: enhanced .mtn-ignore, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker, 2006/08/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Feature Request: enhanced .mtn-ignore, Zack Weinberg, 2006/08/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Feature Request: enhanced .mtn-ignore, Nathaniel Smith, 2006/08/04
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Feature Request: enhanced .mtn-ignore,
Johan Bolmsjö <=
- Re: [Monotone-devel] Feature Request: enhanced .mtn-ignore, Glen Ditchfield, 2006/08/05