Re: [Monotone-devel] Re: summit flag day?

[Thomas Keller]

Markus Schiltknecht schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> Richard Levitte wrote:
> > The only thing that I see might need a flag day of all those things is
> > this mega-cert change, which I'm not sure is needed, relatively
> > speaking.
>
> (Assuming we want atomic certs) I'm thinking about splitting that task 
> up into two: one is the internal change of the storage format: instead 
> of saving multiple certs per revision - each in a row in revision_certs 
> - we collect them together and save them in one single blob / row per 
> revision. That could be done without requiring a flag day or anything. 
> Netsync as well as signing and verifying would work as before.

I'd keep revision_certs as a "local cache" of cert blobs which are 
stored elsewhere (revision_certs_blobs?!). Otherwise we'd have big 
problems with fast lookups of revisions via their certs (i.e. select).

Thomas.

--
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature