monotone-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Monotone-devel] bugreport monotone


From: Zack Weinberg
Subject: Re: [Monotone-devel] bugreport monotone
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 13:34:08 -0700

On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Stephen Leake
<address@hidden> wrote:
>> -- the E* constants are guaranteed since C89 to be macros, so this is
>> safe in general.
>
> Does that mean the gcc MinGW compiler is not compliant with C89?
> That's surprising.

I think there are only two or three E* constants that C89 promises
will be defined at all, so no, MinGW is fine.  The rule is just that
all E* constants that an implementation defines must be macros.

zw




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]