Re: [Monotone-devel] Time for a release

[Thomas Keller]

Am 04.06.2010 05:46, schrieb Derek Scherger:
> On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Thomas Keller <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> I've just talked with Thomas Moschny on IRC and I listened again to his
>> and other people's concerns about switching too fast to 1.0. I think the
>> concerns are reasonable, so we've discussed this issue and concluded the
>> following:
>>
>> * The next version of monotone will be named 0.99 and will be the last
>>  version before the final 1.0.0 is out
>>
> 
> I agree with the general concern that we've had a few branches land lately.
> I wouldn't be surprised in the least to hear some screaming when people
> start using the new changelog editor functionality for example. Also,
> restrictions have been changed a bit, diff has also changed slightly, etc.
> 
> Hopefully these changes are all good and generally liked, but the idea of
> changing a bunch of behaviour and then releasing 1.0 shortly afterwards
> seems a bit questionable.

See it this way:
We're just switching to a different versioning scheme :)

Thomas.

-- 
GPG-Key 0x160D1092 | address@hidden | http://thomaskeller.biz
Please note that according to the EU law on data retention, information
on every electronic information exchange might be retained for a period
of six months or longer: http://www.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/?lang=en

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature