[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2 |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:39:11 -0500 |
>> Where "N" was the file descriptor to write the annotation to; my
>> previous iteration assumed the last argument to post was the filename.
>
>This is Unix, not GNU and it's brain-damanged `rm / -rf'. Isn't it a
>bug that sendaux() appends ["-idanno", "42"] after the draft's filename?
... maybe? It's always done it that way, even back in the original MH.
No one noticed until now.
>Have the interface to post(8), and thus postproc, include the `file'
>parameter as an environment variable as well. True, this means post has
>two places to get the data, but it also keeps simple filter scripts
>simple.
Seems reasonable to me; any objections? I thought maybe there was one
already, and a mhdraft environment variable IS set, but only when using
whatnow; really, we want one guaranteed to exist all of the time between
send and post.
>Though I still think it should be the last argument, otherwise every
>postproc author has to solve the same problem.
I don't have strong feelings about this one; thoughts from others?
Fixing it is a simple change.
--Ken
- [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/06
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10
Message not available