[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2
From: |
David Levine |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2 |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:47:34 -0500 |
Ken wrote:
> ... maybe? It's always done it that way, even back in the original
> MH. No one noticed until now.
My guess is that there aren't that many custom postprocs
in the wild. And who knows what's in them.
> >Have the interface to post(8), and thus postproc, include the
> >`file' parameter as an environment variable as well. True, this
> >means post has two places to get the data, but it also keeps simple
> >filter scripts simple.
>
> Seems reasonable to me; any objections?
I'm not a fan of environment variables, especially when they're
not really needed. And one place to get the data is better than
two.
> >Though I still think it should be the last argument, otherwise
> >every postproc author has to solve the same problem.
>
> I don't have strong feelings about this one; thoughts from others?
> Fixing it is a simple change.
I agree with Ralph. Putting the filename last is the best fix.
David
- [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/06
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10
Message not available
Message not available