[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2
From: |
Bob Carragher |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2 |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Mar 2015 21:18:05 -0700 |
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:47:34 -0500 David Levine <address@hidden> sez:
> Ken wrote:
>
> > >Have the interface to post(8), and thus postproc, include the
> > >`file' parameter as an environment variable as well. True, this
> > >means post has two places to get the data, but it also keeps simple
> > >filter scripts simple.
> >
> > Seems reasonable to me; any objections?
>
> I'm not a fan of environment variables, especially when they're
> not really needed. And one place to get the data is better than
> two.
I also am not a fan of environment variables. They've bitten me
way too many times. Limiting data input to just 1 mechanism is
more preferrable.
Bob
- [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/04
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ralph Corderoy, 2015/03/06
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Ken Hornstein, 2015/03/10
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Multi-homed postproc, v2, Bob Carragher, 2015/03/10
Message not available
Message not available