[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers
From: |
Jeff Johnson |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Apr 2011 01:26:09 -0400 |
On Apr 21, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
> Almost certainly someone has modeled gossip protocols, lemme dig a bit.
Caveat:
This is just the 3-5 minute quick skim search. Take all my comments
as guesses.
This link
http://www.distributed-systems.net/maarten/data/papers/2009.icdcn.pdf
has a closed solution (section 5, and figure 7) for a "wireless" gossip model
that seems
reasonably close to a SKS net.
Note that the results were looking at "optimal" exchange buffer size, not max.
items on a node.
The model assumed full connectivity, presumably that means all other nodes are
just 1 hop away.
This link seems pertinent to computing the "optimal" neighbor count:
http://www.eecg.toronto.edu/~bli/papers/lzhong-globecom10.pdf
Figure 2 would seem to indicate that 5 neighbors is about where the
"fetching rate" maxes out at 100%.
Again this is just random searching and skimming and guessing (while waiting for
downloads to finish *yawn*). YMMV.
hth
73 de Jeff
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
- [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Andy Ruddock, 2011/04/20
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Gabor Kiss, 2011/04/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Jeff Johnson, 2011/04/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Robert J. Hansen, 2011/04/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Ari Trachtenberg, 2011/04/21
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Andy Ruddock, 2011/04/23
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Jeff Johnson, 2011/04/23
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, Andy Ruddock, 2011/04/23
- Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, David Benfell, 2011/04/24
Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers, robert.O, 2011/04/21