Re: [Sks-devel] Optimum number of peers

[robert.O]

For me, it is not the number of peering, but the quantity of the time
zones. 
It is necessary that the keys are available immediately for everyone. 

Afflicted for my English

robert

--------------------------------------------------------------------

On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 20:47:55 +0100, Andy Ruddock
<address@hidden> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 
> Are there any recommendations for the number of peers each keyserver
> should have in the membership file?
> 
> I'm hesitant to add each and every peering offer, but also want to
> ensure my keyserver stays current even if one, or a few, peers are down
> for any reason.
> 
> - -- 
> Andy Ruddock
> - ------------
> address@hidden (GPG Key ID 0xEEC3AFB3)
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
> 
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNrzhrAAoJEAC80KTuw6+zguYP/iM3AT5YwPJ/1m2qczE4WFVE
> 42JOx0xsVPxZJ3e/Qjnh0odvpLufKQJno+kDmAKn+Qm5KY6pfWdsSw8hAx2QadUO
> ROSqToFWtGLoGwrvyYPTe33XW9vtITZNbJ2RmFPxBSVwg2dTnz/CgVfQSR6dF8w+
> ly2GAq0zheBBc8KlEsmg77fAV0UEVmHvR94Ug5Lt9O/kD7MuY7CS4cA04ZoMm6ou
> pPicL1t/NCHiZH90lYxDSELvWlaTcjAi9p39cEGeBR0+hTUoe2fHNFgxxyBdGeqM
> /920XZKzCS7wfI+yzX0iMZJB0ThD66k7KLGy2m4sqklknGCXF0iaNgUzkQ0pTK8f
> 1cUbffpWAasE0X8SrInZwyw5G+vC+RPtrZo/Q4adzqNkSE1VslHqgbS3BFHPCqmk
> I1t9OMIC+/tT4RWZHaGmlCMy+AZIwjeLAwdkK8iOycEKZC/H16Ew6yjxMw8o7tgZ
> 8Ht6kDPqLO43fa8EbsIb1aafAx5URG46hnHjkJRAU/nZASdmvijSP8tDcH9+GlC0
> c2g9fNU5faFnyg1g7pFso6Ua6dRezeyqAzBt5Hteomwu55bstLWea6pXjTpKNANg
> gwOKjWrGVdPF3YwUDG67kQcAlmBzibW8w47Ww12bsurH3niKvMr3gUndYY8LYPd2
> C0F41NB7SCHT5sDmLPwG
> =G8Z4
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sks-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel