[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?
From: |
Andrew Gallagher |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected? |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Sep 2015 15:42:58 +0100 |
> On 1 Sep 2015, at 15:24, Kristian Fiskerstrand <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
>> On 09/01/2015 04:19 PM, Andrew Gallagher wrote:
>> Has anyone performed a survey of sks servers to see how well
>> connected we are? How fragile is the network under failure
>> conditions? Do we rely too much on a small number of links?
>
> If you have a good eye-sight (or a zoom button), you see one such
> graphical display e.g. on [0] that is generated
> based on .dot files I produce out of the network mesh recorded.
>
> Although I look at them manually from time to time, no proper
> statistical analysis or review has been performed on this information.
>
> References:
> [0] https://sks-keyservers.net/files/2014-09_NUUG.pdf
>
That's great, thanks.
One thing that does concern me about the current arrangements is how manual
(and ad-hoc) the peering system is. I can foresee scalability problems...
A
- [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Andrew Gallagher, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?,
Andrew Gallagher <=
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Robert J. Hansen, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Andrew Gallagher, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kiss Gabor (Bitman), 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/09/02
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Daniel Roesler, 2015/09/01