[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?
From: |
Daniel Roesler |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected? |
Date: |
Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:46:15 -0700 |
An interesting issue: pgp.mit.edu (probably the most well known
keyserver) only peers with one other domain in the pool
(keys.riverwillow.net.au), and that peer doesn't peer with anyone else
in the pool. All their peers appear to be out of the pool.
Daniel
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Daniel Roesler <address@hidden> wrote:
> Interesting question! Sounds like a fun 2 hour hack project :)
>
> I wrote a quick python script and d3 visualization for the gossip network.
>
> Visualization:
> http://bl.ocks.org/diafygi/3f344c22f8a37a7b2151
>
> Code:
> https://gist.github.com/diafygi/3f344c22f8a37a7b2151
>
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 7:19 AM, Andrew Gallagher <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Has anyone performed a survey of sks servers to see how well connected
>> we are? How fragile is the network under failure conditions? Do we rely
>> too much on a small number of links?
>>
>> Andrew.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sks-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/sks-devel
>>
- [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Andrew Gallagher, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Andrew Gallagher, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Robert J. Hansen, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Andrew Gallagher, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kiss Gabor (Bitman), 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/09/02
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Daniel Roesler, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?,
Daniel Roesler <=
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Christoph Egger, 2015/09/01