[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?
From: |
Andrew Gallagher |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected? |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Sep 2015 17:24:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 |
On 01/09/15 16:46, Daniel Roesler wrote:
> An interesting issue: pgp.mit.edu (probably the most well known
> keyserver) only peers with one other domain in the pool
> (keys.riverwillow.net.au), and that peer doesn't peer with anyone else
> in the pool. All their peers appear to be out of the pool.
Your graph says pgp.mit.edu has nine pool peers, as does Kristian's
status page...
https://sks-keyservers.net/status/info/pgp.mit.edu
And keys.riverwillow.net.au has four pool peers including MIT...
https://sks-keyservers.net/status/info/keys.riverwillow.net.au
A
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Andrew Gallagher, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Andrew Gallagher, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Robert J. Hansen, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Andrew Gallagher, 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kiss Gabor (Bitman), 2015/09/01
- Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Kristian Fiskerstrand, 2015/09/02
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Daniel Roesler, 2015/09/01
Re: [Sks-devel] Well connected?, Christoph Egger, 2015/09/01