[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sudden instability
From: |
Todd Lyons |
Subject: |
Re: Sudden instability |
Date: |
Thu, 1 Jul 2004 16:24:33 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
Dan Nelson wanted us to know:
>No, only Linux has the three processes. They're due to how
>LinuxThreads emulates threads with processes and a lightweight fork()
>function called clone(). On other systems you'll either see 1 process
>if it's working, or zero if it's not :)
On 2.4.20-20.9 (RedHat 9), I see one process. On 2.6.5 (Gentoo), I see
three processes.
>see if you have an X-Spam-Status: header. If not, then check
>/var/log/maillog for milter timeout messages. If you do see a header,
In my case, the milter dies. I've reverted the spamd report_safe change
on two of the three boxen. I'll report on if it makes a difference
after some time has passed. So far the only one which has crashed since
I reverted the change was the one I have not changed. We'll see if that
holds though.
--
Regards... Todd
We should not be building surveillance technology into standards.
Law enforcement was not supposed to be easy. Where it is easy,
it's called a police state. -- Jeff Schiller on NANOG
Linux kernel 2.6.3-8mdkenterprise 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
- Sudden instability, Todd Lyons, 2004/07/01
- Re: Sudden instability, Dan Nelson, 2004/07/01
- Re: Sudden instability, Todd Lyons, 2004/07/02
- Re: Sudden instability, Dan Nelson, 2004/07/02
- Re: Sudden instability, Todd Lyons, 2004/07/03
- Re: Sudden instability, SG, 2004/07/06
- Re: Sudden instability, John E Hein, 2004/07/06
- Re: Sudden instability, SG, 2004/07/06
- Re: Sudden instability, Dan Nelson, 2004/07/06
- Re: Sudden instability, SG, 2004/07/07