Re: [Xlog-discussion] New to list - questions

[Leigh L Klotz, Jr.]

HTTP on a local port would be a very extensible and simple way and you 
could use URL search queries and get back XML results.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:08 am, Joop Stakenborg wrote:
> Op wo, 19-01-2005 te 16:12 -0600, schreef Peter Laws:
>
> >  >
> >  > Can't really say if N1MM/MMTTY resembles xlog/gmfsk, because I have
> >  > never used a windows environment for hamradio. If you have gmfsk 
> > running
> >
> >  The N1MM/MMTTY combo is pretty slick.  Basically, N1MM uses MMTTY as a
> >  RTTY "engine" and handles all the logging (and dupe checking, scoring,
> >  etc).  MMTTY also has a fine interface of it's own - I made 350 QSOs
> >  in MMTTY alone during last year's WPX, so it's functional!
>
> There are some ideas by Tomi, the author of gmfsk, to enhance xlog <->
> gmfsk interactivity. It's called the 'simple logging protocol'. The
> basic thought is to add a tcp/ip socket to xlog, so the log can be
> queried just like a database (but much simpler). Then we will have a
> 2-way datastream which opens a lot of possibilities. Maybe it will
> appear in xlog-2.0 :-)
>
> Regards,
> Joop PG4I
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xlog-discussion mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/xlog-discussion