[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Submission Procedure
From: |
Peter Simons |
Subject: |
Re: Submission Procedure |
Date: |
21 Jan 2003 02:23:04 +0100 |
Guido Draheim writes:
>> (3) It goes into a "Candidate" or "Proposals" category, but is not
>> distributed in the release archive, but only on the web page.
> No dedicated mailinglist for submissions then?
But of course. :-)
With "distributed" I meant "distributed as part of the archive". The
macro itself should definitely be posted to a mailing list as well as
being posted on the web site. Sorry, I should have put that more
clearly.
Generally, I tend to ignore the _implementation_ of these plans
completely at the moment. I try to think strictly in terms of an
"abstract procedure". Once we have developed that to a degree we feel
comfortable with, hell will break loose when it comes to "how do we do
it". :-)
Peter
- obsoleted vs acinclude tool / Re: Masterplan, (continued)
- obsoleted vs acinclude tool / Re: Masterplan, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool / Re: Masterplan, Peter Simons, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool / Re: Masterplan, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool, Peter Simons, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool, Peter Simons, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/23
- Submission Procedure (was: obsoleted vs acinclude tool), Peter Simons, 2003/01/20
- Re: Submission Procedure (was: obsoleted vs acinclude tool), Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20
- Re: Submission Procedure,
Peter Simons <=
- Re: Submission Procedure, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/23
public releases / Re: Masterplan, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20
wiki / comments / Re: Masterplan, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20